As the tuna we use more or less all the various preparations of dishes, it seemed interesting to compare this article with brands that offers a more consumption, at the base in descending order (best to worst) brands categorized index of quality.
From Altroconsumo
canned tuna
We assessed the brands of tuna more sold on our market, as well as the quality for the social and environmental aspects related to the production of canned tuna, in particular with regard to fishing operations and processing / packaging.
test
leaving no doubt on the ingredient of many main dishes summer, we analyzed the contents of twenty brands of tuna in oil. To get to choose the winner we have conducted a lot of analysis, trying not to neglect any aspect. The test detects, with the necessary grades, an overall good quality of these preserves, but there are serious problems of environmental sustainability that have yet to be addressed seriously by the producers.
Our recommendations echo
Tuna fishing and all predators Sea threatens the species. Limitatene consumption, preferring smaller, more sustainable fish: sardines, mackerel, anchovy in the box, in short, oily fish is good from a nutritional standpoint and from that cuisine.
When you choose a can of tuna, prefer the brands that we demonstrate careful. But beware of those who advertise too much adherence to ethical codes are not supported by independent monitoring organizations.
Although without doubt the yellow-fin tuna is the most valuable (not just judge him for nothing in quality tests) is a species at risk of extinction and as such should be preserved, perhaps sometimes even opting for brands that use tuna less risk, such as skipjack or bigeye tuna.
BRANDS COMPARED descending
coalma
1 2 3 Riomar
consorcio
4 star offshore
delicius
5 6 7 Riomar extra
Maruzzella
8 boatswain low in salt
9 coop
10 ASDO Tues
and the last three places are given marks
18 essex
19 carrefour
20 Atun claro nixe
.jpg)
